In reading Geoffrey Chaucer's
"Canterbury Tales," I found
that of the Wife
of Bath, including her prologue, to be the most
thought-provoking.
The pilgrim who narrates this tale, Alison, is
a gap-toothed,
partially deaf seamstress and widow who has been
married five
times. She claims to have great
experience in the
ways of the
heart, having a remedy for whatever might ail it.
Throughout her
story, I was shocked, yet pleased to encounter
details which
were rather uncharacteristic of the women of
Chaucer's
time. It is these peculiarities of
Alison's tale which
I will examine,
looking not only at the chivalric and religious
influences of
this medieval period, but also at how she would
have been viewed
in the context of this society and by Chaucer
himself.
During the period in which Chaucer wrote,
there was a dual
concept of
chivalry, one facet being based in reality and the
other existing
mainly in the imagination only. On the
one hand,
there was the
medieval notion we are most familiar with today in
which the knight
was the consummate righteous man, willing to
sacrifice self
for the worthy cause of the afflicted and weak; on
the other, we
have the sad truth that the human knight rarely
lived up to this
ideal(Patterson 170). In a work by
Muriel
Bowden, Associate
Professor of English at Hunter College, she
explains that the
knights of the Middle Ages were "merely mounted
soldiers, . . .
notorious" for their utter cruelty(18).
The tale
Bath's Wife
weaves exposes that Chaucer was aware of both forms
of the medieval
soldier. Where as his knowledge that
knights
were often far
from perfect is evidenced in the beginning of
Alison's tale
where the "lusty" soldier rapes a young maiden;
King Arthur, whom
the ladies of the country beseech to spare the
life of the
guilty horse soldier, offers us the typical
conception of
knighthood.
In addition to acknowledging this
dichotomy of ideas about
chivalry, Chaucer
also brings into question the religious views
of his time
through this tale. The loquacious Alison
spends a
good deal of the
prologue espousing her views regarding marriage
and virginity,
using her knowledge of the scriptures to add
strength to her
arguments. For instance, she argues that
there
is nothing wrong
with her having had five husbands, pointing out
that Solomon had
hundreds of wives. In another debate, she argues
that despite the
teaching of the Church that virginity is "a
greater good than
the most virtuous of marriages," there is no
biblical comment
opposing marriage(Bowden 77). Even
though these
ideas may not
seem so radical to today's reader, they would have
been considered
blasphemy to people of Chaucer's time (Howard
143).
The tale itself raises another religious
discussion of the
time: Who should
have the upper hand within a marriage?
King
Arthur gives the
task of sentencing the nefarious knight to his
wife, who
proposes that his life will be spared if he can find
the answer to the
question: "What thing is it that wommen most
desiren?" Following a fruitless search for the answer,
the
knight happens
upon a loathsome hag who forces the knight to
marry her after
she supplies the answer. After
explaining that
women covet power
over their husbands most of all, the termagant
begins her goal
of obtaining just that. Here it is important to
note that many of
the people of England during this time would
have abhorred the
woman who attempted to gain sovereignty over
her husband; for
the Bible "definitely states that woman is to be
subject to her
husband"(Howard 143). Witnessing
the young man in
sorrow at his
fate, the newlywed woman asks the knight if he
would rather have
her be old and faithful or young and possibly
not. When he leaves the decision up to her, thus
giving her
authority over
him, the hag is magically metamorphosed into a
beautiful, young
woman.
Having analyzed the period of Chaucer and how
it relates to
the Wife of
Bath's tale, an obvious question arises: How did
Chaucer personally
feel about this character which he created?
Does he have the
same contempt for this carnal dowager as the
pious masses of
the Middle Ages surely would have? Despite my
twentieth century
urge to laud Alison of Bath in her being
unrepresentative
of the stifling societal norms of fourteenth
century England,
I must admit that Chaucer was probably not very
fond of the now
revolutionary woman. Although I would
like to
think that
Chaucer was a remarkably visionary man in setting
forth this particular
tale, there are signs which contradict
this. For example, another of Chaucer's characters,
the moral
Clerk, offers a
thorough rebuttal of the Wife's opinions.
The
fact that Chaucer
would have used such a virtuous man to rebuke
ideas which he himself
championed is highly unlikely. Another
detail which
supports this opinion is that here we have a woman
who relies
heavily on scripture to support her radical stance,
yet Chaucer
allows her to err in her application.
The mistake
lies in her analogy
of the loaves of bread in which she claims
that it was Mark
who said Jesus refreshed many men with barley
bread; it was
actually John who said this(Justman 125).
While it may be true that my fellow
students and I cheer the
rather raunchy
weaver, the prevailing standards of idealistic
chivalry and
religious misogyny of the Middle Ages kept the Wife
of Bath from
being heralded by most people of that same period --
including her
creator. Looking past my personal views
which lead
me to judge her
by current standards, it can be said that despite
her personal
flaws, Alison's tale is the most original of all the
pilgrims'
accounts (Howard 141). Within the
context of the
Middle Ages, it
was surely a journey beyond the realms of
normalcy, possibly
planting the seeds of feminism in the minds of
some medieval
mistresses.
Works Cited
Bowden,
Muriel. A Reader's Guide to Geoffrey
Chaucer. New York:
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1964.
Howard, Edwin J.
Geoffrey Chaucer. New York: Twayne Publishers,
In., 1964.
Justman, Stewart.
"Literal and Symbolic in The Canterbury Tales."
Modern Critical Views on Geoffrey
Chaucer. Ed. Harold
Bloom.
New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1985.
Patterson,
Lee. Chaucer and the Subject of
History. Wisconsin:
The University of Wisconsin Press, 1991
No comments:
Post a Comment