In his lengthy literary
career, Jonathan Swift wrote many stories that used a broad range of voices
that were used to make
some compelling personal
statements. For example, Swifts, A Modest Proposal, is often heralded as his
best use of both
sarcasm and irony. Yet
taking into account the persona of Swift, as well as the period in which it was
written, one can
prove that through that
same use of sarcasm and irony, this proposal is actually written to entertain
the upper-class.
Therefore the true irony in
this story lies not in the analyzation of minute details in the story, but
rather in the context of the
story as it is written.
One of the voices that is
present throughout the story is that of irony. The story itself is ironic since
no one can take Swifts
proposal seriously. This
irony is clearly demonstrated at the end of the story; Swift makes it clear
that this proposal would
not affect him since his
children were grown and his wife unable to have any more children. It would be
rather absurd to
think that a rational man
would want to both propose this and partake in the eating of another human
being. Therefore,
before an analyzation can
continue, one has to make the assumption that this is strictly a fictional work
and Swift had no
intention of pursuing his proposal any
further.
One of the other voices
that is present throughout the entire story is that of sarcasm. In order to
understand this further, a
reader has to comprehend
that Swift, becoming infamous after Gullivers Travels, was a member of the
upper-class. Right
from the first paragraph
Swift attempts to fool his readers by the sarcasm of the dreary scene that
Swift presents. For
example, he mentions that
it is a melancholy sight to see beggars and their children on the street. The
sarcastic paradox in
this statement is whether
it is a melancholy object for him, having to see homeless people every day, or
for the beggars
lifestyle? Upon first
reading this one may be led to believe that Swift is a compassionate writer
attempting to feel the pain
of the beggars. But as the
story continues, a reader can look back and note that he is using a sarcastic
tone and the only
sad sight that he sees is
the fact that people of his status have to deal with commoners. It is a good
combination that
makes the reader think
twice about any other statements, and the voice used, after the first
paragraph.
This leads to the
underlying statements that appear throughout the story. It is quite clear that
Swift has strong feelings of
resentment, bordering on
hate, for the poor people that wonder the street. For example, he tries to
qualify his proposal by
saying, "it is very
well known that they are dying, and rotting , by cold and famine, and filth,
and vermin . . . they cannot
get work and consequently
pine away for want of nourish.". Once a reader understands this, they can
see the true
purpose of his proposal. He
wants to lower the population of beggars in his country, so what better way to
do it than by
putting an end to the younger
generation of beggars? This is also proven since throughout the story he only
mentions that
the upper-class of society
would be able to purchase the sacrificial children. The upper-class would also
take the
carcasses and use them to,
"make admirable gloves for ladies summer boots for fine gentlemen.".
Also, when he makes
his calculations as to how
many children would be available for sale, he never takes into account the
children from the rich
families. In short, Swifts
message is that rich children serve a purpose, the advancement of Ireland,
while poor children
are nothing but a burden to
the republic.
One other clear indication
that Swift was motivated by his hatred for the poor is the list of six reasons
that he write to
qualify his proposal. In
the third statement, Swift explains how by buying the children and then selling
them to their friends,
the upper-class can keep on
thriving. This was a plan to get themselves even more rich, as Swift states,
"the money will
circulate among ourselves,
the goods being entirely of our own growth and manufacture.". Secondly, he
also compares
this type of meal to that
of eating a pig. He elaborates by naming a variety of ways that you can cook
the child, use if for
bacon, or to make
clothing.He never once mentions what the poor people can gain after they have
been paid the
purchasing price. He only
mentions the benefits of the rich. Yet,Swift wants the writer to believe that
he wasnt attempting
to bring harm to the people
of his country, on the contrary, he was only trying to make his friends rich.
This is another
demonstration of the
sarcasm and irony that Swift uses to both persuade and deceive the reader.
Opponents to this
analyzation of A Modest Proposal would agree that there is irony present in the
story, but it was
intended to demonstrate the
irony that a writer can use to persuade readers in a different sense. In this
case this proposal
was intended to make the
upper-class examine the conditions under which the lower class lived. In fact
it was intended to
help the lower-class to
gain more recognition from the upper class. If a reader does take his proposal
seriously, then the
use irony and sarcasm in
Swifts writing is exemplified. But, if a reader takes note of the irony they
will notice the true point
of the story; the
assistance that the lower-class needs. Either way, the irony is present and
Swift gets his message across.
In response, one could
argue that the whole context of the story must be taken into account. First of
all, one must take
into account the environment
in which the story was written. During this time period, the beggars that Swift
describes
could not read, much less
afford to buy one of Swifts works. Swift was well aware that his audience was
the well-to-do
upper class. He could write proposal like
this knowing that there would be no repercussions since the upper-class would
treat this as a comedy.
Actually, the lower class could have revolted fearing that their children were
in danger if they knew
of the story. In effect, it
is a combination of both propaganda and humor aimed for the educated audience.
Secondly, if
Swift did want to help the
lower-class, he wouldnt have created an exemption for himself in the last
paragraph. If he
wanted to initiate this
plan to help the lower-class, then he should have been the one to start it all.
Also, why would he
propose such a heinous plan
that involves both the sacrifice of another human as well as cannibalism and
expect to be
taken seriously?
Very few authors have had
their works analyzed and critiqued as thoroughly as Swift has. Many of these
essays have
dealt with the question of the true
purpose of A Modest Proposal. One reason that this is so difficult to
understand is
because in actuality there
is a dual irony in this story. Referring back to the example of the first
paragraph, a melancholy
object can work two ways.
Again the question arises; who is it sad for? Even in todays world, there are
some people that
give money to the homeless,
because the homeless are in a sad situation, and there are people that
vehemently refuse to
give money to panhandlers
and they get sad because they have to be bothered by the homeless every time
that they walk
by. It is difficult to
distinguish which one of these dissenting views of irony is correct, that is
assuming that one of them is
valid. This is a difficult
task because we do not fully understand the environment in which it was
written, we can only
analyze the voice in which
it is written. A personal opinion would be that he wrote this story purely for
the amusement of
the upper class. This is
qualified because, as stated before, during the time that this was written the
beggars could not
read and could not afford one of
Swifts works. Also, demonstrating his well executed use of irony and sarcasm
could
have gained him advancement
among his peers.
A reader has to conclude
that a work of this nature, from such a dynamic author, must be read with both
some literary
awe and criticism. One can
spend many hours trying to analyze the words, the sentences and even entire
paragraphs to
find a deeper hidden
meaning in this story. Yet, this story should be viewed as a fictional work and
as one of the best
demonstrations of dual
sarcasm and irony combined. Anything beyond that would be purely hypothetical
and would
distract from the purity of this story.
No comments:
Post a Comment