English 101
³Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been²
In Joyce Carol Oates¹ ³Where Are you
Going, Where Have You Been², there is a
clear interpretation of evil in Arnold Friend and how he as a demon tries to
pull Connie into the dark world of sex and emotion. Oates seems to extract scenarios of real life
and add them into her story. The
character of Arnold Friend is more or less what really is out there. The harsh reality that Oates includes in her
story is that there are deamons like Arnold.
Many people have interpreted Friend¹s character as the Pied Piper of Tucson who was a mass
murderer who killed teens.(Hurley 372).
By incorporating more life like realities in the story, Oates can
construct the evil of Friend in an almost believable setting.
There are many clues in the story that
hint that Arnold Friend is not a friend at all, but is in fact a demon come to
take Connie away. When we first meet
Arnold Friend, it is obvious that Connie has an uneasy feeling about him and
feels violated by his presence. For
instance, Arnold right away starts to ask Connie if ³(She) wansta come for a
ride.² (Oates 1012). Arnold seems to be
pressuring Connie from the start and is obviously not there just to take her
for a ride. The ³ride² that Arnold talks
of could possibly even have a sexual connotation that Connie does not pick up
on because she is so young and blind to the world of sexual pleasures that
Arnold lives in. Oates chooses words too
carefully to show that Arnold is a devious snake. Connie sees Arnold many times as an evil
character and letting the reader know by describing Arnold as a ³pumpkin,
except it wore sunglasses.² (Oates 1013).
In this passage Connie relates Arnold to a Halloween figure and in the
same quote refers to Arnold as ³it². At
other times Oates describes Arnold¹s eyes as evil. ³He grinned so broadly his
2
eyes became slits
and she saw how thick the lashes were, thick and black as if painted with a
black tar-like material.² (Oates 1015).
It is apparent that Oates uses descriptions such as these to illustrate
an unhuman quality in a human form.
Another interesting word choice that Oates uses is when Arnold is
talking perversely to Connie and she comes back with ³People don¹t talk like that,
you¹re crazy,² (Oates 1017). This helps
to illustrate the fact that Connie does not recognize Arnold as human. The reader may feel that Arnold is just a
pushy jerk with a crush on Connie, at least up to this point. It is not until Connie begins to get upset
and threaten to call the police that the reader sees the true demonic side of
Arnold Friend.
Arnold Friend knows too much about
everything and everyone to only be a person especially one who is not from
around the same area as Connie. Arnold
claims to know all of Connie¹s friends and where her family is at which scares
Connie into asking Arnold how he knows so much and his only response is, ³I know everybody.² (Oates 1014). The omniscient capabilities that Arnold shows
are just more justifications of his being a demon, or the devil himself. Arnold not only knows what is going on in the
world around Connie, but also what she is thinking and how she is as a
person. Arnold knows that Connie is
unhappy with her parents in general and taps into this sensitive spot with
Connie as a way to bring her outside and go with him. He felt that if he could draw Connie outside
it would have to be with sex , for Arnold knows that this is what intrigues the
young girl.
The most obvious reason that many believe
Oates is portraying Arnold as a demon is the way Arnold must use trickery and
blackmail to lure the innocent Connie out of her home and into his
clutches. When Connie says she will call
the police to restrain Arnold, he then becomes irate and says he will enter the
house and says, ³You won¹t want that.² (Oates 1018). This harsh threat shows to Connie that he is
capable of anything and intimidates her not to call the police. The demon then goes on to tell
3
Connie that she
better take a ride with him or else he will wait for her family to come home
and ³they¹re all going to get it.²
(Oates 1019). Not wanting anything to
happen to her family, Connie eventually gives in and goes beyond the threshold
of her door and into Arnold¹s realm.
Many people feel that it is Connie¹s compulsive sex drive that destroys
her in the end.(Rubin 42). It is true
that Connie has an inquisitive fascination with sex as do most pubescent young
adults, but is not this that forces to go with Arnold. Yes, Connie is an adolescent but is probably more scared than fascinated
with this man. Connie had always dreamed
of love and how it would always be just like in the movies and songs, but this
was different. Arnold made Connie afraid
of love and sex and he tried to trick
her into coming with him by saying nice and sweet things such as; ³We¹ll go out
to a nice field, out in the country here where it smells so nice and its
sunny,² (Oates 1020).
In the end, Connie seems to be drawn
outside by Arnold¹s powers. The ³vast
sunlit reaches of land² that Oates writes about are new experiences that Connie
has never before experienced. The new
lands that Connie sees behind Arnold are symbolic of new experiences that
Arnold will show her, and possibly sex.
Whether or not she wants to be exposed to sex, Arnold is going to make
sure that Connie is exposed to it, and most likely violently.
Some people interpret that Connie was just
having a ³daymare² (Rubin 43), but if it were true that Connie was only
dreaming, then Arnold¹s character would still have the same effect on Connie in
being a demonic creature and exposing her to the sins of sexual pleasure. Arnold is a character that must be presented
to Connie in some point of her life.
Oates tries to incorporate the idea that not everyone is your friend and
love is not always what you see in the movies or hear in music. Oates attempts to use an extreme reality and
unfortunately, Connie has to learn the hard way.
Works Cited
Hurley, D.F. ³Impure Realism: Joyce Carol Oates¹ ³Where Are You Going, Where
Have You Been?² Studies in Short Fiction Summer, 1991: 371-375.
Rubin, Larry ³Oates¹
³Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?²
Explicator 1981
v42 : 57-60.
Piwinski, David
J ³Oates¹ ³Where Are You Going, Where
Have You Been?²
Explicator, Spring 1991: 195.
Oates, Joyce
Carol. ³Where Are You Going, Where Have
You Been?² The Story and
Its Writer. Ed. Ann Charters. Boston:
Bedford Books of St. Martin Press
1995
1009-1021.
No comments:
Post a Comment