At first glance the quote "life is like
a box of chocolates seems" rather silly.
How could such a large and complicated concept such as life be compared
to something as small and simple as a box of chocolates? There have been two opposing viewpoints in
regards to the meaning of this quote, and each viewpoint comes about by a
different analysis of what life and chocolates represent as well as what they
mean in today's world. The conclusion to
the question can only come about through a thorough examination of the quote
itself along with its possible entailments to see what both groups of people
deem important and what they choose to ignore.
Both arguments seem to work well to counter the other and show the flaws
in the other explanation's theory.
According to the World Book Encyclopedia,
life is "a state, existence, or principle of existence conceived as
belonging to the soul." Most
people, when questioned about life would not have a very clear or concise
answer because life is not something that is wholly tangible. In general life is considered to be
everything that happens to a person from the moment they are born to the moment
they die. All of their interactions with
the world and all of their thoughts and actions. There does not seem to be any plan or order
to these events, just everything that happens.
Everything. Life is a long process
with good, bad and indifferent points.
According to the World Book Encyclopedia, a
box is "a container, usually with four stiff sides, a bottom, and a lid to
pack or put things in," and chocolate is "a substance made by
roasting and grinding cacao seeds."
A box of chocolates would logically be a container which holds cacao
products. A scientific dissection of a
box of chocolates would show a box (usually rectangular or heart shaped) filled
with anywhere from one to dozens of small, individually wrapped
chocolates. Usually the type of
chocolate and the filling of each individual varies inside a given package. In America however, a box of chocolates means
much more then this simple addition of definitions and a direct visual analysis
would lead one to believe. A box of
chocolates, in our referent system, is a symbol. It generally symbolizes love, and through
metonymy, has been made to mean love.
When a gift of a box of chocolates is given on Valentine's Day, it more
than symbolizes love, it actually means love.
The meanings have become blurred over the years as chocolate has become
a standard gift. It is not an original
thought to give someone chocolate, but more a means of showing love. Not an act of love, but merely an expression
of love.
The first group
of people generally finish the simile "life is like a box of
chocolates" with the conclusion "you never know what you're gonna
get." This group views all the
meanings of life and of the box of chocolates and found the best compilation to
be that both in life, and in chocolates, there is randomness and a lack of
order. When a person walks out of the front
door of his house on a Monday morning, there is no way for him to know if he is
going to find a hundred dollar bill tucked under his doormat, or a large meteor
that has fallen and crushed his car.
It's hard to know if a day is going to be a good day or a bad day, you
just know that it will be a day. The
same holds true for eating a box of chocolates.
When you open a box of chocolates, there are rows of non-differentiated chocolates. They all look the same, and yet you know some
are filled with cream, some with caramel and some with coconut. When you pick one up, much like when the man
opens his front door, there is no way of knowing if you will get a good
chocolate (cream) or a bad chocolate (coconut), you just know you'll get a
chocolate. For both examples it will not
be easy to tell if it was good or bad until the chocolate, or the day, has been
completed. You never know what will
happen.
The second group of people generally finish
the simile "life is like a box of chocolates" with the conclusion
"a thoughtless perfunctory gift that nobody really wants." This group takes up an opposing analysis and
says that the important part of chocolates is not the randomness of them within
the package, but instead the symbol that people don't really think in life, but
instead just perform as they are expected to.
Since chocolates have come to mean love, people no longer do creative
things to express their love. They
simple buy chocolates. Once the
chocolates are delivered, then what.
People don't actually want the chocolates, they want the love. Since the chocolates have assumed the meaning
of love, the chocolates themselves go to waste.
Who wants to eat their love?
Instead of being eaten immediately, as chocolates are truly intended to
be, they are showed to friends and relatives, and eventually put on a shelf or
in a cabinet. They will get eaten if
someone shows desire, but it's not important.
Under this interpretation, life is pointless and merely for show. People don't do things because it is what
they feel that they should, people do things because they are expected to (just
as the lover is expected to give chocolate).
It is better to put up an lofty facade, then to be true and honest to
the people around you.
No comments:
Post a Comment