It would be
short-sighted to presume The Ecstasy of Rita Joe a somewhat dogmatic
condemnation of English Canada's - indeed, all of Canada's - neglect of Native
culture. What George Ryga likely
intended was more a universal pronouncement of guilt on the government's part
with regard to all issues of morality, whether unrecognised or, if you will
forgive my coyness, unintended. At the
play's most fundamental level, however, there can be no doubt as to Ryga's dissatisfaction
with the government's injurious and indelicate treatment of Native affairs, and
the subsequent effect such inactions provoke in the scattered Native
communities.
The government is
not the lone culprit, Ryga would likely argue; whether non-Native reluctance to
accept Native culture as distinct within Canada is the result of government
promulgation remains to be determined (it is likely a xenophobic reaction
perpetuated at the various levels of government by the individual members
themselves who, as representatives of their communities, reflect that
community's inherent prejudice).
Especially curious with regard to this matter are what Ryga referred to,
quite baldly, as the "murderers".
In the first
instance, they appear to represent the government vise as it bureaucratically
squeezes the life out of nonconformists, and then the anvil, upon which the
deformed constituency is reshaped and redefined. These sentiments reverberate throughout the
opening pages:
No comments:
Post a Comment