Andrew
Brian
11-17-96
Fresh Sem.
II
"'Vengeance is mine,' sayith the
Lord". What does this mean? I
believe what the
Christians meant it to mean is that we, as humans, have no
right to seek
revenge, that only "the Lord" has the right to decide when to
take
revenge. We say this, but do we follow
it? No, I think not. We all try
to take revenge
into our own hands, in one form or another.
Revenge is one strong theme that holds
throughout "Hamlet". We see
Prince Hamlet try
to execute a kind of private vengeance, an eye for an eye,
which is
completely opposite of the Christian teachings.
Hamlet is a man
who believes in
heaven and hell and who feels that a man who challenges
divine ordinance
will ultimately face judgment. We might
look at the ghost
of the late king
Hamlet as the part of us that wants to take vengeance into our
own minds. Like the little voice in our heads that tells
us to do something,
when in our hearts
we know it is wrong.
When Horatio, Barnardo, and Marcellus tell
Hamlet of their sighting of
the ghost, Hamlet
agrees to join them that night and see if he can observe the
ghost firsthand
and possibly speak with it. That night when Horatio,
Marcellus, and
Hamlet sight the ghost, it beckons Hamlet to leave the other
two and speak to
it in privacy. Hamlet follows, despite the protests of the
others, who fear
it may be an evil spirit, disguising as King Hamlet in order
to gain their
trust. Horatio suggests that it may lead him astray and then
"assume some
other horrible form / Which might deprive your sovereignty of
reason / And draw
you into madness..." (I, iv, 80-82). Hamlet insists on
listening to the
message of the ghost. Although he does not state it, perhaps
Hamlet
subconsciously considers that Horatio is right, that the ghost is indeed
a false messenger
sent to trouble him.
Hamlet does not kill Claudius immediately
following his encounter
with the ghost
because he is unsure of the ghost's accusations of Claudius
and does not want
to murder him without proper motive. Hamlet would
suffer in the
eyes of the people if he were to murder Claudius, the reigning
king, and claim
his motive was the words of a ghost. Hamlet already
disapproves of
Claudius due to his marriage to Hamlet's mother, Gertrude, so
soon after the
death of her first husband, King Hamlet. Prince Hamlet feels
that the widow
did not sufficiently mourn and that the marriage is incestuous
due to the
relation between the late husband and the new groom. The timing
of the marriage
causes Hamlet to suspect that Claudius and Gertrude had an
affair during her
marriage with King Hamlet. Despite this, most Danes see
nothing wrong
with the marriage and express no suspicions about King
Hamlet's death.
Because he must expose Claudius's murder of King Hamlet
in order to
legitimize his own murder of Claudius, Hamlet can not
immediately kill
Claudius and explain his motive later, once he is guilty of
murder. He must
first find proof that Claudius did in fact do wrong that
brought about his
father's death.
Some of Hamlet's opportunities for killing King
Claudius are poorly
timed, most
notably following Claudius's expression of alarm after watching
an enactment of
the murder of Gonzago. This is a time when Claudius's
image has been
tarnished and the people may be suspicious of him in
connection to the
death of King Hamlet. However, when Hamlet goes to the
royal chambers to
confront him, but finds Claudius kneeling in prayer.
Now might I do
it, now he is a-praying,
And now I'll do
't. And so he goes to heaven,
And so am I
revenged. That would be scanned:
A villain kills
my father, and for that,
I, his sole son,
do this same villain send
To heaven.
Why, this is hire
and salary, not revenge.
He took my father
grossly, full of bread,
With all his
crimes broad blown, as flush as May;
And how his audit
stands who knows save heaven.
But in our
circumstance and course of thought
'Tis heavy with
him. And am I then revenged
To take him in
the purging of his soul,
When he is fit
and seasoned for his passage?
No.
Up sword, and
know thou a more horrid hent.
(III, iii, 77-93)
Hamlet decides that if he were to kill Claudius
during prayer, Claudius
would be sent to
heaven, which would not be the proper revenge he seeks, so
instead, Hamlet
decides to wait and take his life at a time he is in sin. Hamlet
hesitates and
analyses the situation of each assassination opportunity in a
likewise manner.
Instead of simply acting on an opportunity he considers
each consequence
of the timing and circumstances; each time he decides,
"The time is
out of joint" (I, v, 210).
After promising his father's ghost that he will
gain revenge on
Claudius for the
"foul and most unnatural murder" (I, v, 31), Hamlet lets
opportunities to
murder Claudius pass by, waiting for a time when all will
realize he is
right in the act so that Claudius will die in shame. He hesitates
because he is
unsure the ghost was indeed his father's ghost, he can not be
sure that
Claudius did murder King Hamlet, and because there are times
when Claudius's
soul and/or public image would benefit from Hamlet's
deed, thus he
would not die a villain's shameful death. In the end Hamlet
does accomplish
this goal of revenge and Claudius is known to be the villain,
but due to the
delay in the murder, both Hamlet and his mother, Queen
Gertrude, also
join the two kings among the realm of the deceased.
I believe that humans have a craving for
revenge and this
unquenchable
thirst is depicted in "Hamlet".
But I do not feel that anyway,
man or god, has
the right to take revenge. I believe
that this is one wall that
Humanity must
climb before it is to reach the next plain of evolution. We
need to look past
what others do and try to show them why it is wrong and
how they not only
hurt others, but themselves as well.
When we become one
as the human
race, then we shall be able to move out of the rut we have been
in for
centuries. "How we approach other
people determines how quickly we
evolve, how
quickly our life questions are answered.
You must be
completely open
as are the people who bring you messages.
They will help
you by opening
you up. And they will fill you with
warmth and energy."
(The Celestine
Prophecy) I do not remember seeing
Hamlet trying to
understand his
step-father, nor did he try to help him see what he had done
wrong. No, he only saw anger and hatred. He let this hatred eat him inside
and control his
actions. So I see "Hamlet" as
a reflection of the rut that
humanity is stuck
in. So I now end with this one question;
"do two wrongs
equal a right
one?"
No comments:
Post a Comment