I.Pro
II.Con
III. My opinion
IV. Bibliography
Pro
According to N.C.A.A. rules, college
athletes are not to receive any windfall from any merchandise sold- even if
they are tho only reason people buy it. In other words, even if the merchandise
is purchased solely because of an athlete's popularity, that athlete receives
no money.
For example, how many University of
Michigan basketball fans would have bought jerseys with number four on the back
if Chris Webber did not wear it first?
The
student athletes are not permitted to have jobs during the school year.
Scholarship athletes' incomes are limited to their room and board check, per
diem money on road trips, and whatever money their families can spare.
If the school is turning a profit off an
athlete, shouldn't the athlete receive their own fair share?
CON
Student athletes should be treated the same
as the other university students. They already have many added perks that put
them ahead of other pupils.
In the classroom, they receive special
consideration like specific notes and study guides. Also, lucrative summer jobs
are seemingly always lined up for them. For example, Dugan Fife, former captain
of the University of Michigan basketball team, was employed by the Detroit
Lion's front office one summer.
Also, if the student athletes feel cheated
because their university is turning a profit from their name and likeness, they
are obviously good players who will go on to play professional sports anyway.
They should be able to wait and in a few years they'll be in a professional
league, raking in ridiculous amounts of money.
College athletes should not recieve income
from their universities. They are already getting a free education and memories
that will last forever.
MY OPINION
I do not beleive that college athletes
should be paid to play, period. College athletes should have to budget their
money like the rest of the students at their university. If they are really
hurting for money, they should save the money that they earn from the summer
jobs that are lined up for them.
If universitiesbegan paying athletes to
play, lids would play for money, not for the love of the game. The hustle and
emotion would vanish, and laziness and greed would appear in its place.
One of the main reasons I love to attend
collegiate athletic contests is because the athletes are playing because they
love the game. I've concluded that professional games aren't as thrilling
because it is not as fun or emotional.
The
benefits these kids get from "Friends of the Program" and the
university should truly be enough.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Prior
knowledge
2. Internet use
3. Albomm Mitch.
FAB FIVE. New York: Warner Books, 1993.
--------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment