Social Criticism
in Literature, As Found in George Orwell's Animal Farm and Charles Dickens' A
Tale of Two Cities."
Many authors receive their
inspiration for writing their literature from outside sources. The idea for a
story could come
from family, personal
experiences, history, or even their own creativity. For authors that choose to
write a book based on
historical events, the
inspiration might come from their particular viewpoint on the event that they
want to dramatize.
George Orwell and Charles
Dickens wrote Animal Farm and A Tale of Two Cities, respectively, to express
their
disillusionment with
society and human nature. Animal Farm, written in 1944, is a book that tells
the animal fable of a farm
in which the farm animals
revolt against their human masters. It is an example of social criticism in
literature in which
Orwell satirized the events
in Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution. He anthropomorphises the animals, and
alludes each
one to a counterpart in
Russian history. A Tale of Two Cities also typifies this kind of literature.
Besides the central theme
of love, is another
prevalent theme, that of a revolution gone bad. He shows us that,
unfortunately, human nature causes
us to be vengeful and, for
some of us, overly ambitious. Both these books are similar in that both
describe how, even with
the best of intentions, our
ambitions get the best of us. Both authors also demonstrate that violence and
the Machiavellian
attitude of "the ends
justifying the means" are deplorable. George Orwell wrote Animal Farm,
". . . to discredit the Soviet
system by showing its
inhumanity and its back-sliding from ideals [he] valued . . ."(Gardner,
106) Orwell noted that "
there exists in England
almost no literature of disillusionment with the Soviet Union.' Instead, that
country is viewed either
with ignorant disapproval'
or with uncritical admiration.'"(Gardner, 96) The basic synopsis is this:
Old Major, an old boar
in Manor Farm, tells the
other animals of his dream of "animalism": " . . . Only get rid
of Man, and the produce of our
labour would be our own.
Almost overnight we would become rich and free.'" (Orwell, 10) The other
animals take this
utopian idea to heart, and one day actually
do revolt and drive the humans out. Two pigs emerge as leaders: Napoleon
and Snowball. They
constantly argued, but one day, due to a difference over plans to build a
windmill, Napoleon exiled
Snowball. Almost
immediately, Napoleon established a totalitarian government. Soon, the pigs
began to get special
favours, until finally,
they were indistinguishable from humans to the other animals. Immediately the
reader can begin to
draw parallels between the
book's characters and the government in 1917-44 Russia. For example, Old Major,
who
invented the idea of
"animalism," is seen as representing Karl Marx, the creator of
communism. Snowball represents
Trotsky, a Russian leader
after the revolution. He was driven out by Napoleon, who represents Stalin, the
most powerful
figure in the country.
Napoleon then proceeded to remove the freedoms of the animals, and established
a dictatorship,
under the public veil of
"animalism." Pigs represent the ruling class because of their
stereotype: dirty animals with insatiable
appetites. Boxer, the overworked,
incredibly strong, dumb horse represents the common worker in Russia. The two
surrounding farms represent
two of the countries on the global stage with Russia at the time, Germany and
England.
Orwell begins his book by
criticizing the capitalists and ruling elite, who are represented in Animal
Farm by Mr. Jones, the
farmer. He is shown as a
negligent drunk, who constantly starved his animals. "His character is
already established as
self-indulgent and
uncaring." (King, 8) Orwell shows us how, "if only animals became
aware of their strength, we should
have no power over them,
and that men exploit animals in much the same way as the rich exploit the
proletariat."(Gardner,
97) What was established in Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution was not true
communism
("animalism"),
which Orwell approved of, where the people owned all the factories and land.
Rather, "state communism"
was established, where a
central government owned them. Orwell thought that such a political system,
"state
communism," was open
to exploitation by its leaders. Napoleon, after gaining complete control, did
anything he wished -
reserved the best for the
pigs, and treated the animals cruelly. The animals could not do anything,
unless they again
realized their strength in
numbers against their own kind. Unfortunately, they were too stupid to realize
this and accepted
the "status quo."
It began when the milk and apples were appropriated to the pigs, and continued
to when the pigs could
drink and sleep on beds,
until finally the pigs were the "human masters" to the rest of the
animals. Orwell criticized
Germany, representing it as
Pinchfield Farm, which betrayed Animal Farm by paying for lumber with
counterfeit money.
In real life, this
represents the Soviet-Germany non-aggression pact during World War II which
Germany eventually
broke. Eventually, towards
the end of the story, the term, "absolute power corrupts absolutely,"
is proven, as the pigs,
who retained all the privileges
for themselves, have evolved into a different caste from the other animals.
Orwell's
implication is that
"real" communism cannot exist in the countries which claim to be
communist. The ruling class -
politicians - own
everything and ironically are therefore in total control.
A Tale of Two Cities is a
love story which chronicles the lives of Charles Darnay, a Frenchman who
renounced his link
with the aristocracy, and Sydney
Carton, a wastrel who lived in England. Both these characters fall in love with
Lucie
Manette, the daughter of
Dr. Alexandre Manette, unjustly imprisoned in France for 17 years. Though Lucie
marries
Darnay, Carton still loves
her and in the end, gives his life to save Darnay for her. Dickens, who was
fascinated with
French history, especially
the French Revolution, begins by criticizing the aristocrats' treatment of the
poor people of
France. In the seventh
chapter of book two, the Monsieur the Marquis had accidentally driven his
carriage over a young
child, killing him. Instead
of worrying about the child's welfare, the Monsieur's reaction was to worry
about his horses:
"One or the other of
you is for ever in the way. How do I know what injury you have done to my
horses."(Dickens, 111)
He deemed their lives
inferior and insignificant, as illustrated when he threw a gold coin to the
child's devastated father as
compensation. The Monsieur
the Marquis revealed his true sentiments to his nephew: "Repression is the
only lasting
philosophy. . . fear and
slavery, my friend, will keep the dogs obedient to the whip. . ."(Dickens,
123) Dickens makes it
abundantly obvious that the
aristocrats are to meet doom, with symbolic references to fate and death. For
instance, as the
Monsieur the Marquis rides
through the country, a glowing red sunset appeared over him, signifying his
bloody death. In
the words of the author,
". . . the sun and the Marquis going down together. . ."(Dickens,
114) Madame Defarge's
knitting is also a symbol
of impending doom, as she records the names of all those who are to die when
the revolution
takes place.
Dickens also expresses his
disillusionment with some of the outcomes of the French Revolution. He believed
that the
people did not just
liberate themselves, but also took vengeance towards the aristocracy. This is
confirmed in the
conversation between the
revolutionaries: " Well, well, but one must stop somewhere. After all, the
question is still
where?' At extermination,'
said madame."(Dickens, 341) Madame Defarge embodies this attitude, as she
wants to have
Charles Darnay killed, not because he has
done something wrong, but because he is related to the Evr‚monde family,
which killed her relative.
Though "Dickens seems almost to regard violence as the one way to bring
about social
change,"(Lucas,288) he then
began to denounce the actions taken by some of the revolutionaries. The
citizens let their
righteous cause turn into
vengefulness. Even servants and maids to the aristocrats were beheaded, although
they had not
really done anything wrong.
Animal Farm and A Tale of Two Cities were written to express their authors'
disenchantment
with the state of evolution
of human nature. They seem to be saying, that even when we begin with
honourable intentions,
there will be some of us
who will let their base instincts take control. Orwell, in Animal Farm portrays
this nature by
parodying events in real
history. Given the right conditions, those events could happen anywhere - a
leader becoming
overly ambitious, to the
point of harming his people for morepower. In A Tale of Two Cities, Dickens
examines the inner
soul, and shares with us how
people are driven to the valley of human emotions, where desperation and anger
reign, and
what could happen
afterwards if we let these emotions build up inside. Every human being is
capable of becoming a
ruthless, opportunistic
being like Napoleon or Madame Defarge, if placed in the right place, at the
right time.
Works Cited
Coles Editorial Board.
Coles Notes: Animal Farm. Toronto: Coles Publishing Company, 1996. Dickens,
Charles. A Tale
of Two Cities. London:
Orion Publishing Group, 1994. Gardner, Averil. George Orwell. Boston: Twayne
Publishers,
1987. Kaplan, Fred.
Dickens: A Bibliography. New York: William Morrow & Company, Ltd., 1988.
King, Martin.
Students' Guide to Animal
Farm. Scotland: Tynron Press, 1989. Lucas, John. The Melancholy Man: A Study of
Dickens'
Novels. London: N.P., N.D.
Orwell, George. Animal Farm. London: Penguin Books, 1985. Shelden, Michael.
Orwell:
The Authorised Biography.
London: Mandarin Paperbacks, 1992. Written in Toronto, 1996.
No comments:
Post a Comment