Introduction: The
1940's and the next four decades after, were a time of bitter
struggle between
the US and the Soviet Union. National
identity as well as ideological
differences
brought both countries to the brink of nuclear war, a revolutionary style of
warfare causing
the most disastrous demographic disaster known to man. There are
numerous
speculations on who actually started the war.
It can be argued both ways that
both the US and
the USSR acted offensively towards each other.
But the only real fact is
that "one
represented an open democracy and the other a closed totalitarian system"
and
both were the
only real superpowers left standing after World War II.1 This split
generated a
bipolar effect bringing the entire world into a game of tug of war between the
two superpowers.
Throughout the four decades actual combative war never broke out but
in turn a similar
game of chess was played. One country
would move and the other would
countermove. It was finally America that came out on top
and the Soviet Union a
collapsed
failure, but not necessarily because the US was stronger and out muscled the
Soviets
militarily. The end of the Cold War was
primarily due to economic factors.
What America proved was that the economy works
best when the government
stays out and
individuals within the society do the work.2
It is only the individuals within
the society that
truly understand what products are in demand.
Under Communist regime
a few select
rulers decide what are the needs of the society, what resources are their
country's
scarcities, and how to obtain these scarcities.
Finding this information is a big
job and requires
endless amounts of domestic attention.
With this in mind the quote
"Nature's
laws are immutable... Communism is only an ideal dream"3 becomes much
clearer. One leader simply does not have enough time
nor money to invest in the
acquisition of
thorough and accurate knowledge pertaining to the country's economic
system
(especially a country as large as Russia).
But I am not writing to debate whether
communism can or
can not work but that America/Democracy did not really beat
Russia/Communism
in the Cold War. Russia/Communism
destroyed itself. Russia
blotched the
job. How? By instead of striving to build the country's
economic muscle
and develop
mutually beneficial relationships with neighboring countries therefore
acquiring the
otherwise unavailable scarcities, Russia chose to attempt building an empire
throughout Europe
and Asia based on the ideological concept of Communism and by
competing with
the United States in an arms race it could not support.
Directly after WWII, Stalin set Russia up under
a Communistic regime. Having
suffered the
greatest casualties during WWII, it would seem common judgment that
Russia's focus be
more on domestic rehabilitation than international affairs. On the same
side the fact
that Stalin set up a Communistic government would also lean in favor that
Russia must
strengthen itself before turning to international affairs. As stated earlier The
Communist form of
Government is similar to that of a car with a standard transmission. In
order to drive
the car one must be able to shift the gears accordingly. Stalin does not
focus on the domestic
issues fronting his Country and in no way shifts the gears of
Russia's
economy. In 1948 Stalin begins to
struggle with Yugoslavia's leader Tito with
the argument
Tito's version of Communism did not match the Soviets.1 Also in 1948,
Stalin used military
force to destroy the democratic nation of Czechoslovakia and reinstate
Soviet
Communism.2 Much of Europe was already
in such shambles from the effects of
WWII that the
only hope was seen in the United States, furthermore whether it be
Communism or
Democracy did not matter as much as simply getting moving. It was not
until 1949 when
Stalin ordered the block around West Germany in order to obtain the
entire city, that
the US stepped in.3 The United States
rolled Russia back and the Cold
War began.
Stalin still avoided dealing with his Country's
domestic problems such as the
economy, and
issues of human rights, decided if he
could not expand his weak deceitful
empire throughout
Europe then maybe Asia would be a good place to try. Throughout
the 1950's Russia
aided in developing Soviet communism throughout China, Korea,
Vietnam, and
smaller third World Countries such as Indonesia, India, Egypt, And Syria.1
Whether by force
of influence Russia tried to set Soviet Communism up and in each place
the US was also
there to stop them.
Tensions between the US and Soviets grew and
between the years of 1957 and
1962 an arms race
broke out.2 The Soviets launched the
first nuclear satellite called
Sputnik.3 Both Countries raced to develop ICBM and SLBM
missiles.4
Russia was limited economically though. They had spent all the post-war time
meddling in
international business trying to set up a weak empire of Soviet Communism
throughout the
continent of Europe and Asia. Meanwhile
unrest existed at home as the
Government
shifted all spending into the arms race with the US. This economic decision
exhausted the
Soviet economy and off balanced the entire industrial system.5 Russia's
final offensive
against the United States was known as the Cuban Missile Crisis. 6 This
offensive
resulted in little more than a small trade of the US removing its missiles from
Turkey.
By the end of the arms race with America,
Russia was economically destroyed and
before long
collapsed. Although little is written
about how the Russians dealt with their
domestic problems
during the Cold War, We do know from looking at the results,
economic
starvation and political depravation, that it was not enough. The powerful
country of Russia
emerged from WWII with major domestic needs that were not met by
the leaders of
the country nor were the leaders of the country ready to attempt the
beautiful theory
of a Communistic society hence
Russia/Communism destroyed itself in
the Cold War by
ignoring its domestic and economic needs and not forming dependable
and mutually
beneficial relationships with neighboring countries.
End Notes
Page 1 :
1.
Spiegel, Steven. World Politics in a New Era, Harcourt Brace; 1995.
2. Allen William, The midnight Economist.
Thomas Horton; 1997.
3. Feline Peter, Americans and the Soviet
Experiment. Harvard University Press;
1967.
Page 2 :
1. Spiegel, Steven. World Politics in a New
Era, Harcourt Brace; 1995.
2. Same as above
3. Same as above
Page 3 :
1. Spiegel, Steven. World Politics in a New
Era, Harcourt Brace; 1995
2. Same as above
3. Same as above
Bibliography
Allen, William, The Midnight Economists. Thomas
Horton, Sun lake, Arizona;
1997.
Feline Peter, Americans and the Soviet
Experiment. Harvard University,
Cambridge, Ma;
1967
Spiegel Steven, World Politics in a New Era.
Harcourt Brace; 1995
The Doomed Empire
BY: Eric Paul
Professor Spiegel
TA: Mr. Kalhor
Section: 1L
1/28/97
No comments:
Post a Comment