With the advent
of the feminist movement, the role of women in all parts of society has come
under
increasing
scrutiny. One area of recent controversy is the role of women in the Christian
Church.
Some churches whose
traditions and practices are less rigidly tied to Biblical doctrines have begun
placing women in
leadership positions such as pastor or teacher. Other churches which interpret
the
Bible more
literally have been slow to adopt such changes. Much of the confusion is based
on
attempts to
interpret scriptures pertaining to women. In this essay, we will use the Bible
to
understand the
role of women in the church of the first century and apply that understanding
to the
church of the
twentieth century.
Many people would
dispute the Bible's relevance to contemporary thought in general, and in
particular to the
role of women in worship. If the Bible were not written under divine
inspiration, a
person or
practice is not bound by its teachings. He or she can therefor pick and choose
whatever
corresponds to
his/her point of view. However, if the Bible is of divine inspiration, then a
cautious
consideration of
passages relevant to a particular issue must be undertaken. Traditions and
customs
that have arisen
after the Bible was written may thus be carefully scrutinized. Such practices
may or
may not prove
sound after comparison with scripture.
Before we discuss
specific issues concerning women in worship, we should consider principles
derived from the
relationship of Adam and Eve as described in Genesis chapter one. The Apostle
Paul frequently
uses this passage as a guideline when discussing women and women's issues.
Genesis 1 verse
27 states: "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he
created
him; male and
female he created them." Most Commentators agree that man and woman are
both
equally a
reflection of God's image; the word "man" here is used as a synonym
for humanity. Adam
and Eve were also
given joint dominion over creation. But the fact that Adam was created before
Eve has
significance to Paul and other Old Testament scholars; it signifies role
distinction between
the two sexes.
The role of the man is leadership, while the role of woman is as a source of
strength
and support. In
the letter to the Ephesians, Paul states: "For the husband is the head of
the wife as
Christ is the
head of the church. . ." (Eph. 5:23) This is an important analogy. If a
person wants to
understand the
Christian authority of a man over his wife, he must consider how Christ
demonstrated
his leadership as
head over the Church. Primarily, he gave his life for his church, not using
force or
coercion for her
submission. When considering mens and woman's ministry in the church, it is
important to keep
in mind this role distinction.
Lets examine the
public ministry of women in the Church. Two major passages give specific
instructions
regarding women during worship in the letters of the Apostle Paul. These two
passages
are used
frequently when denying women a public role in church life. The first is in I
Corinthians
chapter 14 verses
33 - 35, this passage commands women to be silent during worship service.
Similarly but
with more details, I Timothy 2 verses 8 - 15 not only contains a command to be silent
but also
instruction on authority along with a reference to the fall of Adam and Eve for
further
explanation. Here
is the passage in its entirety using the NIV (New International Version) Bible
translation:
I want men
everywhere to lift up holy hands in prayer, without anger or disputing. I also
want
women to dress
modestly, with decency and propriety, not with braided hair or gold or pearls
or expensive
clothes, but with good deeds, appropriate for women who profess to worship
God. A women should
learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to
teach or to have
authority over a man; she must be silent. For Adam was formed first, then
Eve. And Adam was
not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a
sinner. But women
will be kept safe through childbirth, if they continue in faith, love and
holiness with
propriety.
A woman raised in
the U.S. in this day and age, reading the letter for the first time, may be
quite
taken aback by
its apparent chauvinism. However, there are some specific historical and
cultural
references that
must be taken into account when considering the meaning and intent of this
passage.
First of all,
this was a letter written by Paul to a young preacher named Timothy. Timothy was
presumably
preaching at the church in the city of Ephesus. Paul starts out the letter by
telling him to
stay in Ephesus
and correct false teachers who were creating a disruption in the church.
Various
commentators have
tried to re-create some of the heresies of these false teachers. This can be a
difficult task
since there is not a record of exactly what was being said, so only remarks
made in the
text itself can
give a clue. One probable heresy was the idea of asceticism as a way to achieve
spirituality. The
ascetic practices being recommended consisted of; abstinence from certain
foods,
from marriage,
and sex. Add to all of this physical training as an additional means of
spirituality. It
was thought that
through these practices, one could achieve something akin to heaven on earth.
In
other words,
there was possibly a denial of a future physical resurrection being taught in
favor of a
spiritual one
that could be achieved in their present lifetimes. It seems also from Paul's
remarks that
many women in the
church had been converted to this message and they were being persuaded to
renounce their
traditional roles in favor of a more egalitarian way of life in line with their
new-found
spirituality.
This would explain the strong words Paul makes in reference to Eve, reminding
the
women that she
was indeed led into sin, and that bearing children and raising them was a good
thing,
not unspiritual
as they were being taught.
Yet, the other
parts of this passage that admonish women not to teach and not to have
authority over
a man have been
agreed upon by many, if not most, commentators to have timeless application;
the
words and grammar
in Greek do not lend themselves to any cultural reference. The teaching that
Paul is concerned
about here is specifically the truths of the faith while the authority in
question refers
to women in
governing or leadership positions of the church.
But, before
making conclusions on a Biblical truth it is important to see if the truth
holds fast
throughout the
whole of scripture. Let's consider some other passages. In Galations 3 verse
28, Paul
states:
"There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you
are all one in Christ
Jesus." Some
commentators have suggested that this teaching could have had some influence in
the
false teachings
that were encountered in Ephesus and Corinth in regard to women. Christ himself
taught that in
the afterlife, men and women would not be given in marriage and they would be
like the
angels. Thus, the
women were being encouraged, by some misguided teachers, to renounce their
traditional
roles. Without taking this radical extreme, the modern reader is at least
inclined to ask
what it means
that men and women are one in Christ Jesus? It must certainly mean that there
is not
one sex inferior
to the other.
Beyond this,
their are clear examples in the book of Acts that may shed some light by way of
documented
practice, on the command not to have authority over men. First of all, there
were
prophetesses. In
Acts 21: 8 - 9, Philip, one of the seven deacons, is said to have four
daughters who
prophesied.
Prophesying was not primarily divination of the future but also the conveying
of Gods
Word to his
people, i. e. teaching. Furthermore, in 1 Corinthians 11: 4 - 5 Paul states,
"Every
woman who prays
or prophesies. . ." Clearly women in Corinth were praying and prophesying
during the
worship service. There is also the case of Precilla and Aquila described in
Acts Chapter
18. Many
Commentators feel it is significant that whenever this couple are mentioned in
the Bible,
Precilla, the
women, is mentioned first because of her great knowledge. It appears that they
worked
together as a
teaching team and their effectiveness is demonstrated when they taught Apollos
"the
ways of the Lord
more adequately" (Acts 18: 26). Apollos is described as a learned man who
came
to Ephesus and
began teaching from the scriptures in a knowledgeable way although lacking in
one
of the
fundamental teachings. Another Case in point is a business woman named Lydia
who lived in
Philippi. She
accepted the Gospel message from Paul and Silas while at a place of prayer.
After this
incident is
recorded, a strong church is mentioned in Philippi later in the Bible. We can
only surmise
that she played a
significant part in the growth of this church, since no men were initially
converted.
These passages
all call into question the real nature of the moratorium on teaching and the
meaning
of no authority
mentioned in 1st Timothy. That women were teaching men is obvious, although at
times they may
have been co-teaching with male teachers. The case of the prophetesses is also
compelling
because although most churches do not recognize prophecy as being a modern
gift,
teaching
certainly is and this was one of the important functions of a prophet.
Some Commentators
in discussing women's ministry in the New Testament have brought to light the
customs of the
day regarding women. Paul's main concern was the spread of the Gospel and that
the
message could be
made attractive in every way. For this reason Paul encourages women in other
passages to
continue observing social customs such as the wearing of a veil; otherwise
people might
criticize them as
loose or immoral and belittle the Gospel message. This is, I believe, a valid
thought
not only in 1st
century times but in our culture today. Consider, for example, what non
believing
women in the US
think upon entering a Christian assembly for the first time and seeing a
service that
appears to be run
completely by men? They may conclude that women are being suppressed and
that the gospel
message makes women inferior to men.
In conclusion, we
can say that although there is no sanction in scripture for women to take roles
of
leadership, public
ministry and teaching are not as clearly forbidden and a degree of latitude in
interpretation is
warranted. More importantly, if women are not allowed to have a voice or some
kind of input,
the church could be loosing a valuable resource. If a husband does not consider
his
wives thoughts
and ideas as being important or valid, his family is surely incomplete,
dysfunctional
and doomed to
failure. Therefore, as the church strives to realize Gods purpose for women, we
must
remember the
truths of the scripture and apply them to our present day culture. This will
allow men
and women to
present the Christian message to our world in the most powerful way. That is
exactly
what the Apostle
Paul desired along with all of the New Testament leaders and it is what we
should
desire as we
consider the path of the modern church.
No comments:
Post a Comment