Juan Valdez
??-??-96
Politics
The United States has been a super power for
decades, and since America has always involved themselves in other countries'
problems. Instead of isolationism, the country has practiced getting involved.
Since the Monroe Presidency, America has been named the World's police force.
Dispelling anarchists, and stopping coos, the united states portrays itself as
the world protector. Since Monroe, some Americans have felt that isolation is
the way to go, and most feel that it is our right to offer assistance. Two
recent incidents, Operation Desert Storm and The War in Bosnia have allowed the
United States to show off it's strength, both on the military and political
level. It has also given the chance for America to evaluate it's foreign
policy, but can the World Super-Power continue to police other countries in
light of earlier battles, or should the stationed troops pack up and home for
good.
Americans have always been overseas, protecting
or overseeing the peace of another country. During the Monroe administration
many US Policies were established, some of which are still in effect today. The
Monroe Doctrine, passed into law by Congress under Monroe, has forced the
United States to get into so many conflicts with neighboring Latin American
countries. Sometimes even European countries declared war on America because of
this doctrine.
The Monroe Doctrine was delivered by James
Monroe to the United States Congress in 1823. Since that time, this document
has been the cornerstone of the United States foreign policy. This document was
established for two major reasons, both involving European countries on United
States soil. The first was Russia, who at the time was planning to establish a
colony on the pacific northwest coast, the United States felt that it was a
strategic military position, and if ever at war with Russia, it would pose as a
threat. The second was that several European nations were planing to help Spain
recover some of it's 'New World' colonies which had declared independence. The
United States saw this as a threat as well. For these reasons, Monroe made an
statements to various nations.
"One
statement warned Russia that the American continents were 'not to be considered
as subjects for future colonization by any European power." A second
warned France, Russia, Prussia, and Austria that any attempt to extend their
'system to any portion of this hemisphere' would be considered 'dangerous to
our peace and safety' and any attempt to control independent American
governments an unfriendly act toward the United States."1
With these and other
statements, John Quincy Adams drew up the Monroe Doctrine, and Congress voted
and passed it.
The Monroe Doctrine was stressed during the
time of Roosevelt's Presidency. During this era many foreign policies were
given up, such as the Platt Amendment. Roosevelt decided that instead of the
"Old
single-handed enforcement of the Monroe Doctrine,"2
that they should
rely only on the other American nations for the enforcement of their laws.
Along with this Roosevelt showed very little signs of strength towards foreign
countries. When Cuba was full of riots under the leadership of Machado,
Roosevelt did nothing. In 1934 America gave up the Platt Amendment, and removed
the marines from Haiti.
The Vietnam War was one of the most influential
wars in American History. The United States did not actually lose, but ending
with a cease fire was considered a loss. When all of the troops returned they
were looked upon by the American public scornfully. This caused both the troops
and the American citizens to dislike the government. Many riots took place and
many public displays happened.
"...in
response to a drive by the North Vietnamese forces into the South, President
Richard M. Nixon ordered the mining of harbors off North Vietnam. Both the
bombing ant the mining provoked sustained antiwar protests within the United
States."3
For many years
the United States government was very uneasy about getting into any heavy
conflicts with other nations, for fear that it may turn into another Vietnam.
Resent towards the governments decision is still around, but it is dissipating
fast, mostly because of all of the good things that the United States has done.
All of this has changed since that time. United
States foreign policy is one of the most complicated problems that has arisen.
With the two World Wars, United States foreign policy was used greatly to
secure a peace for Europe. With the first World War, America's entrance was a
decision of President Wilson's when he asked congress if they could declare
war, stating:
"The World
must be made safe for democracy."4
The entry of the
United States into World War II was an event that will be remembered for some
time. America entered the war when Pearl Harbor in Hawaii was bombed from the
air by Japanese air planes, thus destroying America's state of neutrality.
In each of these wars America has played a huge
role, being one of the biggest and strongest Super-Power. At that time the
United States established everything. The United States also kept troops over
on foreign soil, despite reports that they were coming home.
Proceeding to the end of the 20th century, a
look at the Bush administrations during the Gulf War shows how big of a part
the United States actually played in the war. The United States contributed over
forty thousand troops to the Persian Gulf, and much more was given in finances
to fund the war. The six weeks that the war took place during was all handled
by General Colin Powell and a team of military experts. Without Secretary of
State James Baker foreign relations with Russia and Iraq would have been
impossible. Other European countries sent in military personnel, but the bulk
of the military force was taken care of by the United States. The attacks were
all coordinated through the United States. Most air bombings and sea launches
were done by American aircraft. When victory was achieved, the world portrayed
it as America's Win.
Television allowed the Persian Gulf War to be
seen in television sets throughout the country. With the introduction of this
new technology, American citizens were filled with a burst of patriotism for
the country that they had forgotten. With this a lot of attitudes shifted or
were enforced into believing that America was a good policeman. It got the bad
guy, and at the same time saved the girl. American opinions of peace-keeping in
other countries changed when they viewed desert storm. It was a very popular
war, people were getting all excited over the troops over there. Yellow ribbons
were popping up everywhere, it was the topic everyone knew about. I think that
this is a main reason why Americans won't be able to stop helping out other
countries. Basically put, helping is in an American's nature. Americans have
been through hell all of there life, that they don't want it too happen to
another people. So, they help in their little part, and exclaim that it was
their country that did it.
With the addition of Bosnia-Herzegovina, many
Americans are beginning to remember the Cold War and Vietnam. The war in Bosnia
has been ongoing continuously since the breakaway of Yugoslavia from the former
Soviet Union. In an effort to gain themselves an independent country, 3
ethnic-diverse groups are fighting over their rights to Bosnia. In an effort to
save the peace, President Clinton stated:
"We can't be
everywhere. We can't do everything. But where our interests and values are at
stake - and where we can make a
difference - America must lead. We stood up for peace in Bosnia."5
With help from
the UN and other countries, the United States has sent in peace-keepers and
troops in an effort to stop the bloodshed.
It is obvious that humankind perceives the
United States as the policeman of the World. There are many with diverse
opinions on the subject of United States foreign policy. Some say that the
United States should just hole themselves up and not come out to help out
another country. Others insist that it is our duty as Americans, being tied to
other countries because of ancestry, that we must help any country in need,
even if they don't know they're in need. In President Clinton's State of the
Union Address he states that:
"All over
the world," he declared, "people still look to us... We must not be
an isolationist or the world's policeman. But we can be its best
peacemaker."6
The most recent peace-keeping mission is that
of Haiti, where more than twenty thousand United States troops have been sent
there to keep the peace of it's local inhabitants.
When he was
before the United Nations, in concern to the ten thousand troops in Haiti the
president said:
"America is
a reluctant Super-power with no desire to be the world's policeman. The United
States will use 'diplomacy when we can, but force is we must' because America
has a 'special responsibility' to lead a generation with a 'sacred mission' to
spread diplomacy around the globe."7
So it appears
that the president is showing that although the United States does not want to
police the world, we can just make sure it's peaceful.
The majority of Americans feel that what the United
States us doing is good, and that we should help out less-peaceful countries to
become more like ours. In concern to Bosnia and why the United States shouldn't
intervene:
"Once again
the United States is about to plunge into another Vietnam. Before we make the
same mistake twice it is important to make several things clear. First of all,
our national interest is not involved in Bosnia. Bosnia is isolated, has no
strategic resources, and it does not straddle or control international trade
routes. Second, we are getting involved in a foreign civil war, as in Vietnam;
we are not stemming any kind of international aggression. Third, America cannot
afford to become the world's policeman."8
"I have felt
for a long time now that the United States should be involved militarily in
Bosnia. Once we created 'safe havens', we were morally obligated to make them
both safe and havens. To our shame, we did neither. Now we are finally
deploying to Bosnia, but for all the wrong reasons."9
The idea of the United States losing a battle
seems impossible to most American citizens today. Being the only remaining
Super-Power has most Americans feeling that they're better than others. The
undying truth is, in some cases they're not. Currently a Japanese child's
education is about one hundred extra days than an American child. Statistics
also show that among American children, a major percentage is lazy. The Voting
Public has become less aware in Political Events, and some don't keep up with
World Events either. The average American citizen goes home everyday and spends
no time thinking about Bosnia, Haiti or any other country where United States
troops are stationed. Most Americans only become aware of troops in a foreign
country when one dies, or a big catastrophe occurs. China's economy is growing
a mile a minute, they have the fastest child birth rate, and are expected to
reach the level of a Super-Power within the next couple years.
The foreign policy that President Clinton
stated in his latest State of the Union address can be interpreted in various
ways. Instead of referring to America as a policeman, he used the phrase
"best peacemaker." He stated what a difference America made with it's
troops, such as Bosnia, Haiti, North Korea, the Middle East, and Northern Ireland.
President Clinton forgot to mention to the beating the Chechen rebels received
from Russia or any other significant event which appears to be a loss for the
United Nations.
The United Nations was formed on January 1,
1942 when twenty six nations created the United Nations Declaration in
Washington DC It can be easily perceived that the United States heads the
United Nations. Being the strongest of the four remaining Super-Powers the
United States has always been placed above other countries when thinking of
status. The United Nations has hundreds of peace-keeping missions a year, and
in the course of these missions, troops are needed to keep the peace. Though
the United States doesn't generally respond to little United Nations requests,
the United States does give full support when a international law is broken. A
good example of this would be the Persian Gulf War when neighboring Iraq
invaded Kuwait without warning and took over the country, establishing martial
law. This goes against treaties established by the United Nations and thus
actions needed to be taken.
America cannot continue to police the whole
world, It is obvious that the troops are dispersed throughout it. If a
catastrophe, uprising, war, etc.. were to break out what would the United States
do. The troops would be out there and not in the country where they should be.
A suggestion to President Clinton from one of his cabinet members was to
convince the United Nations to form a UN Army. The whole project was to be
volunteer, the soldiers were to be recruited from various countries, trying not
to discriminate. United Nations Officers would go through a series of tests to
make sure that no Sadaam Husseins came into control. The idea for a United
Nations army is an honorable idea, yet questions arise such as where will the
army be located, funding for equipment, and barracks would be needed. Weapons
would have to be supplied, an array of ships, both land and air, up to date,
new technology. This is going to cost a lot. Even now the United States is
behind in our United Nations' payments. So where will all this money come from,
China is currently trying to conform to it's increasing population, Japan is
struggling though the economy is prospering. The answer is plainly private
investors, but the purpose of the United Nations was to bring all of the
world's countries together. This question will remain unsolved until either
President Clinton, or United Nations' General Secretary Boutros-Boutros Ghali
find an answer.
Another topic involving the United States and
how to limit our policing is NATO. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is no
longer because of the break up of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War.
When NATO was in effect the United States had a weapon in it's arsenal that could
have been used. The problem with NATO is not that it's too old, the problem is
that it is need of repair. President Clinton should go over it with the
adjoining countries and they should revise the foundations of NATO to fit the
new world. Back when NATO was first beginning the thought of a global
communications network called the Internet was unheard of. NATO could be a
vital resource of the United Nations as well, with NATO the United Nations
would be able to organize countries better, especially the militaries. The
whole purpose behind NATO was to gather together the armies of the countries
against the Soviet Union in the case of an attack. The problem with the United
Nations is that they need to organize an army.
"...that
will ideally mean the creation of a specially trained force of soldiers put at
the United Nations' disposal. The structure of their command would have to be
clear-as clear as that of NATO, the only multinational outfit capable of
packing the punch that any intervention force needs. That in turn would require
big changes at the United Nations, but they are not impossible ones. If made,
President Clinton would then have no good reason to withhold American units
from future United Nations' operations commanded by non-Americans..."10
Another problem, which President Clinton is
solving with a budget cut, is military spending. With the cut, the already low
defense budget will have to squander just to keep it's troops in foreign
countries. Even in times of peace the government takes a big chunk out of the
tax bin to pay for the military. If we had less troops in active duty
throughout the world, the less we would have to pay for shipments to them.
These shipments include food, weapons, ammo, armor, vehicles, aircraft, etc.
These things can range from prices of four dollars up to a couple billion
dollars. When they pay for this the money is taken away from other programs,
such as scholarships, medi-care, transportation, etc. Each year spending for
the troops increase phenomenally. There are a couple solutions, the president
can jack up taxes, instead of cutting them, or bring home some of the troops.
"President
Clinton's defense budget for 1996 will cut spending of $5.7 billion, but will
complete the historic restructuring of United States' military from a Cold War
juggernaut to a leaner force designed
for regional contingencies."11
With Americans stationed in over twenty plus
countries other than those outlined in this report, the United States would
have a very hard time trying to recall them all back home. The stability of the
country may not handle it as well. The United States will just have to face that
because of it's first impression such a long time ago, the country will always
be viewed as the world police. No matter how much military spending Clinton
cuts, Americans themselves still feel a pride to be born and live in a country
free from tyranny, where a person has a right to choose. Most Americans view
foreign countries at war as a little lost puppy, wandering around haphazardly,
searching for it's lost form of government. The United States citizens want to
invite the puppy in and nurture it into a democracy like themselves. So far
this policy has gone well, with minor incidents, hopefully in the years to
come, it stays that way.
Footnotes:
1) Compton's NewMedia Inc., Compton's
Encyclopedia
Copyright 1994, WebPage from Electric Library
URL=http://www.elibrary.com/ 5/5/96
2) Southwestern Company, The Volume Library
(vol.2)
Copyright1989, pg. 2212
3) Compton's NewMedia Inc., Compton's
Encyclopedia
Copyright 1994, WebPage from Electric Library
URL=http://www.elibrary.com/ 5/5/96
4) Southwestern Company, The Volume Library
(vol.2)
Copyright1989, pg. 2213
5) Brewer, Norm, State of the Union:Clinton on
everything from Bosnia to welfare reform
Copyright 1996, WebPage from Electric Library
URL=http://www.elibrary.com/ 5/5/96
6) Ibid., WebPage from Electric Library
URL=http://www.elibrary.com/ 5/5/96
7) Omicinski, John, Clinton to UN: America not
the World's Policeman
Copyright 1994, WebPage from Electric Library
URL=http://www.elibrary.com/ 5/5/96
8) Voorhis, Jerry L., Intervention in
Bosnia:Opinions
Copyright 1995, WebPage from Electric Library
URL=http://www.elibrary.com/ 5/5/96
9) Ryan, Timothy, Intervention in
Bosnia:Opinions
Copyright 1995, WebPage from Electric Library
URL=http://www.elibrary.com/ 5/5/96
10) Rubenstein, Ed., World Cop ?
Copyright 1992, WebPage from Electric Library
URL=http://www.elibrary.com/ 5/5/96
11) Spitzer, Kirk, Clinton proposes cutting
defense budget by $5.7 billion
Copyright 1995, WebPage from Electric Library
URL=http://www.elibrary.com/ 5/5/96
Bibliographies:
1) SouthWestern; The Volume Library (Vol. 2)
SouthWestern Company, Nashville, Tennessee,
Copyright 1989
2) Spitzer, Kirk; Clinton Proposes Cutting
Defense Budget by $5.7 million
Gannett News Service, WebPage,
URL=http://www.elibrary.com/, Copyright 1995
3) Rubenstein, Ed; World Cop ?
Economist Newspaper, WebPage, URL=http://www.elibrary.com/,
Copyright 1992
4) Omicinski, John; Clinton to U.N.:America not
the world's policeman
Gannett News Service, WebPage,
URL=http://www.elibrary.com/, Copyright 1994
5) Brewer, Norm; State of the Union:Clinton on
everything from Bosnia to welfare reform
Gannett News Service, WebPage,
URL=http://www.elibrary.com/, Copyright 1996
6) Compton's NewMedia Inc.; Compton's
Multimedia Encyclopedia
Compton's NewMedia Inc., WebPage,
URL=http://www.elibrary.com/, Copyright 1994
7) Shapiro, Isaac; Intervention in
Bosnia:Opinions
Los Angeles Times, WebPage,
URL=http://www.elibrary.com/, Copyright 1995
8) Auster, Bruce B.; America as SuperCop
US News & World Report. New York, Copyright
1994
9) Summers Jr., Harry G.;Persian Gulf War
Almanac
Facts on File Inc., New York, Copyright 1995
10) Vulliamy, Ed; Seasons in Hell: Understanding
Bosnia's War
St. Martin's Press, New York, Copyright 1992
No comments:
Post a Comment