My essay is on "Drinking and
Driving Offences". In my essay I
will
tell you the
various kinds of drinking and driving offences, the penalties,
and the defences
you can make if you are caught drinking and driving.
Let me tell you about the different
offences. There are six offences
in drinking and
driving. They are "driving while
impaired", "Having care
and control of a
vehicle while impaired", "Driving while exceeding 80 m.g.",
"Having care
and control of a vehicle while exceeding 80 m.g.", "Refusing
to give a breath
sample", and "refusing to submit to a roadside screen test.
These are all
Criminal Code Offences.
Now lets talk about the penalties of
drinking and driving. The
sentence for
"refusing to give a breath sample" is usually higher than
either of the
"exceeding 80 m.g." offences.
Consequently it is usually
easier in the
long run for you to give a breath sample if asked. If, for
example you are
convicted of "Refusing ato give a breath sample" for the
first time, but
was earlier convicted of "Driving while impaired", your
conviction for
"Refusing" will count as a second conviction, not a first,
and will receive
the stiffer penalty for second offences.
For the first offence here is the
penalty and the defences you can
make. Driving a vehicle while your ability to drive
is impaired by alcohol
or drugs is one
of the offences. Evidence of your
condition can be used
to convict
you. This can include evidence of your
general conduct, speech,
ability to walk a
straight line or pick up objects. The
penalty of the
first offences is
a fine of $50.00 to $2000.00 and/or imprisonment of up
to six months,
and automatic suspension of licence for 3 months. The second
offence penalty
is imprisonment for 14 days to 1 year and automatic suspen-
sion of licence
for 6 months. The third offence penalty
is imprisonment
2
for 3 months to 2
years (or more) and automatic suspension of licence for
six months. These penalties are the same for the
following offences.
"Having Care and Control of a Motor
Vehicle while Impaired" is another
offence. Having care and control of a vehicle does not
require that you
be driving
it. Occupying the driver's seat, even if
you did not have the
keys, is
sufficient. Walking towards the car with
the keys could be suffi-
cient. Some
defences are you were not impaired, or you did not have care and
control because
you were not in the driver's seat, did not have the keys,
etc. It is not a defence that you registered below
80 m.g. on the breath-
ayzer test. Having care and control depends on all
circumstances.
"Driving While Exceeding 80 m.g.
is the next offence. Driving a
vehicle, having
consumed alcohol in such a quantity that the proportion
of alcohol in
your blood exceeds 80 miligrams of alcohol in 100 mililitres
of blood. Some defences are the test was administered
improperly, or
the breathalyzer
machine was not functioning properly.
"Having Care and control of a Motor
Vehicle while Exceeding 80 m.g."
is the next
offence I will talk about. This offence
means having care and
control of a
vehicle whether it is in motion or not, having consumed alcohol
in such a
quantity that the proportion of alcohol in your blood exceeds 80
miligrams of
alcohol in 100 mililitres of blood. The
defences are the test
was administered
improperly, or the breathalyzer machine was not functioning
properly. To defend against breathalyzer evidence you
must understand how
the test should
be administered. The proper procedure
for a breathalyzer
test is as
follows. Warming up the machine until
the thermometer registers
50 degrees
centigrade. This should take at least 10
minutes. The machine
should then be
turned to zero (by using the "adjust zero control") and a
comparison
ampoulel (of normal air) inserted. if the metre remains at zero,
the test can
proceed. An ampoule with a standard
solution is then inserted.
3
If the metre
reads high or low by more than .02% on two successive tests,
the machine
should not be used. If the trial is
valid, the machine should
be flushed with
room air and the pointer set at start.
You will then be
asked to provide
two breath samples, about fifteen minutes apart. Normally
they will take
the result of the lowest result and use it as evidence
against you.
"Refusing to Give a Breath Sample"
means refusing without a
reasonable excuse
to give a sample or refusing without a reasonable excuse
to accompany a
polic officer, when demanded by the police officer. Before
demanding by the
police officer, he must have reasonable and probable
grounds to
believe that you are committing or at any time in the preceeding
two hours have
committed, one of the offences of driving or having care and
control of a
vehicle while impaired or while having a blood alcohol level in
excess of 80
m.g. You can refuse to give a breath
sample until you have
communicated in
private with your lawyer even if this takes you beyond the
two hour period,
unless it is shown that your request for a lawyer was not
genuine and
merely to delay the testing. The test
can be done after the two
hour period, but
a technician must testify in court as to what your blood
alcohol would
have been in the two hour period. You
cannot refuse to accom-
pany the officer
until you see your lawyer. You can argue
that the officer
didn't have
reasonable and probable grounds to suspect you, but this however
depends on the
circumstances.
"Refusing to submit to a Roadside
Screening Test" is the last
offence. When you commit this offence you are refusing
without reasonable
excuse to give a
breath sample for a roadside screening device, or refusing
without
reasonable excuse to accompany a police officer for the purposes of
giving such a
sample, when demanded by an officer. Before
the officer
demands a
breathalyzer he must reasonably suspect that you have alcohol in
your blood.
4
The maximum penalties for impaired
driving causing bodily harm to
someone is up to
10 years in prison and up to a 10 year prohabition from
driving. The maximum penalties for impaired driving
causing death is up
to 14 years and a
10 year prohabition from driving. The
maximum penalty
for manslaughter
and criminal negligence causing death is up to life in
prison and up to
a lifetime prohabition from driving.
I think that these penalties for all
the drinking and driving
offences are very
appropriate, but I think impaired driving causing death
should be a
lifetime imprisonment. Also if a person
is impaired and
causes bodily
harm to some one they should have their licence suspended
from him for 20
years instead of 10 years.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Highway Traffic
Law, (Copyright January 1986: Community Legal Education
Ontario) p.17-32
Government
Document, Canada Law Reform Commision Report on Investigative
Tests: Aclohol,
Drugs, and Driving Offences (1983).
Erwin,Richard E.
M.Bender ,Defence of Drunk Driving Cases, Criminal Civil
(Albany 1986)
p.79-81
Purich, Donald
John, Drinking and Driving:What To Do If Your Caught
(International
Self Counsel Pr. 1978) p.22-25
Verticle File at
Hill Crest Library, Drinking and Driving-Offences ands
penalties:A
Summary (1988) p.2
Verticle File at
Hill Crest Liabrary, Criminal Code-Part 6 (1989),
section 3,
section 11.
Verticle File at
Hill Crest Library, HighWay Trafic (1989), section 26
No comments:
Post a Comment