Christina
Bosilkovski
Page # 1
Have you ever been walking in the
woods or along a deserted beach when you suddenly receive some sort of
enlightening epiphany? Where does this inspiration come from? It comes from
nature, my friend. Nature has the power to reveal to us the mysteries of the
universe, helping us to better understand our relationships with the
environment, its creatures and even ourselves. Scott Sanders’s “Settling Down,”
William Cronon’s “Getting Back to the Wrong Nature,” Ursula LeGuin’s “May’s
Lion,” and Aldo Leopold’s “Thinking Like a Mountain” explore the other-worldly benefits
humans reap from nature, proving nature to be a source of enlightenment and
revelation. Thus, nature, as a center for learning and enlightenment, must be
protected from human exploitation out of respect for its abilities to instruct
and guide us.
Sanders’s “Settling Down” reflects
the instructive capabilities of nature as the narrator gives an account of his
enlightening experience watching a hurricane from his front porch, describing
its spiritual, human and ecological implications. Sitting on his porch, Sanders
“dissolve[s]” (34) into the wind, feeling as if he has become part of the wind and
satisfying his curiosity. So incredible is this hurricane to him that he refers
to it as a “tremendous power…. a god” (34). Hence, he believes in the superior
abilities of nature to overpower us and humble us, illustrating just how
powerless and insignificant humans really are, despite how supreme we boast
ourselves to be. Sanders then backflashes to the story of the Miller family, a
family he knew as a boy; despite all the natural disasters and misfortunes that
befell their farm, the Millers refused to
Christina
Bosilkovski
Page # 2
abandon their home.
We can receive inspiration from this story about the value (not just monetary
value) of a place in which someone has invested so much time, love and effort;
it becomes the place to which one is rooted, or attached to by more than just
legal or financial concerns. Sanders, furthermore, suggests that this
rootedness of place in a sort of “reveren[t]…deep attentiveness to forces much
greater than our own” (35) may bring the miracles of salvation (35). This
language is loaded with spiritual or religious diction, giving us hope that we
can attain the spiritual paradise of heaven by learning from nature, further
emphasized by the image relating God as a circle to a respect for your own
sacred, rooted place (37). This image depicts God as a circle whose center is
everywhere, since God is everywhere at all times; thus, one can reach
enlightenment anywhere, as long as he is rooted to the spot.
Moreover, Sanders points out the
instructive capacity of nature in helping us learn about human values and
ecological awareness. After expressing his admiration of the determination and
perseverance of the Millers, Sanders notes, “…most human achievements worth
admiring are the result of such devotion” (35). This sound advice expresses the
value of determination and perseverance and the fruitful benefits they may
produce, given due time; for instance, we believe in putting forth effort, time
and money into obtaining a complete education in hopes that we will reap
sizable benefits in the future (i.e. high-paying job, nice cars, etc.). Sanders
also correlates the value of rootedness and commitment to a place to human
recklessness in our relationships with both other humans and with the
environment. Expressing concern in our tendency as a
Christina
Bosilkovski
Page # 3
nation to relinquish
responsibility and ignore our failures by simply moving on to something or
somewhere else, Sanders underscores the importance of sticking to one place and
working through our problems as the solution to several seemingly unconnected
problems of our society. For example, our alarmingly high divorce rate can be
in part attributed to the impatient “quick-fix” attitude of our nation. If a
solution in not close and within plain sight, we tend to abandon the effort
completely. Such is our attitude towards nature also. As soon as we’ve
exhausted the utility or resources of a certain area, we irresponsibly move on
to destroy a new area instead of restoring vitality to the one we have leached.
Hence, we can learn to accept responsibility for our actions, which may remedy
many of our society’s problems.
Likewise, Cronon’s “Getting Back to
the Wrong Nature” demonstrates the instructive role of nature as a source of
revelations to humans. Although Cronon argues that the nature we have today is
just a creation of human society, he claims there is much we can still learn
from wilderness. Cronon believes that humans must accept a sense of belonging
to the wilderness, and, in so doing, humans can receive a notion of what an
“ethical, sustainable, honorable”
human role in the environment is. We must view ourselves as part of the
wilderness to encourage a responsible attitude towards the environment and to
remind ourselves that the whole world does not revolve around the needs and
wants of humans (78). Hence, by renouncing the “set of bipolar moral scales”
(78) of anthropocentrism we have established and by perceiving ourselves as part of
wilderness, we can receive a sense of responsibility and duty towards that of
which we
Christina
Bosilkovski
Page # 4
are a part,
similar to Sanders’ concept of the acceptance of responsibility as the solution
to many of our society’s problems. Once we accept the wilderness as part of our
“home” (78), we can recognize the
impact of our actions on all that surrounds us; further, it can help us
appreciate the wildness of that which we do not term “wild,” such as a tree on
a street corner. Since wilderness can, therefore, be found anywhere, much like
the meaning behind Sanders’ image of God as a circle, we can experience it
everywhere, inspiring a “critical self-consciousness in all of our action” (79)
as we realize that all of our actions as humans have their impact on something
somewhere.
Like Sanders, Cronon extends his
conception of nature’s revelations to a spiritual and moral level. Cronon’s
call for the union of the human world with the world of wilderness will not
only foster environmental awareness, but also help us succeed at “the unending
task of struggling to live rightly in the world” (79). Thus, it offers hope of
salvation, while lighting the correct moral path or attitude that must be
followed in order to attain it. Moreover, LeGuin’s “May’s Lion” narrates a
farmwoman’s encounter with a lion both on a realistic level and a fictional
level, demonstrating similar revelations nature has made to the human world.
While the fictional account seems perhaps somewhat too embellished or
idealistic, it helps convey across the significance of a closeness to nature
and the benefits we may receive from this union. In the fictional account, when
the sick lion comes so near Rains End’s house, the narrator speculates that the
sick lion may have come so near them because he is “spiritually moved to act
strangely” (311). Hence, he implies that humans are not the only ones with
emotions and souls, but that animals too
Christina
Bosilkovski
Page # 5
can act beyond the
primitive level; furthermore, the narrator wonders that perhaps the lion is a
messenger sent to deliver revelations from some greater force (311). Thus, the
narrator perceives the lion, sent by an other-worldly power, as a possible
source of enlightening information yet unknown to humans. Heaven-sent angels,
for instance, are most closely associated with the idea of other-worldly
messengers, delivering messages of hope and inspirational guidance. The
narrator depicts the lion’s death as a gift brought to May in order that she
may be enlightened by it, but that despite man’s interference with this gift
when the police came and shot the lion, May still benefited from this encounter
when she “followed the lion where he went, years ago now” (313), implicating
that May was reunited with the lion in heaven when she died. Thus, LeGuin even
breaks new ground in suggesting that not only do animals have souls, but that
they may also go to heaven too.
Leopold’s “Thinking Like a Mountain”
also delves into the revelations nature imparts unto us, teaching us the
importance of ecological awareness and the foolishness of our anthropocentric
attitude. The narrator describes how after watching a wolf that he shoots die,
his perceptions of his place in the world and how he thinks of nature change.
He contrasts the anthropocentric human mode of thinking with the mountain’s
nature-centered mode of thinking. He relates how he ambitiously rushes forward
to kill the wolf, believing that the fewer wolves in the world, the better off
humans would be. Yet, after seeing the “fierce green fire d[ie] in her eyes”
(138), he realizes the error in his system of beliefs. He learns that what may
seem better for humans in the short-term may have harmful effects on the
environment (i.e. populations that are typically preyed on by wolves may
increase dramatically if wolves are extirpated, causing other problems by
disturbing the ecological balance), which is why the mountain disagrees with
the narrator’s former human-centered views (139). Leopold concludes by
suggesting that there is hidden meaning in the wolf’s howl: salvation may lie
in wildness (141). Hence, as in the other three narratives, nature offers us
hope of salvation if only we can learn the lessons it can teach us.
Thus, nature has much to offer us in
terms of guidance and salvation, if only we are open-minded and perceptive
enough to receive this instruction. So, is there indeed a balance that is
beneficial to both humans and to nature that can allow both to coexist without
ruining the other? If humans can learn from nature’s lessons, not only would
our relationship with the environment improve but so would our social problems
overall. There is a balance- however delicate it may be- that allows humans to
obtain what they need of nature’s resources while encouraging environmental
prosperity and responsibility. Whether we pick up on and follow nature’s hints is
up to us.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment