ÒUnless we accept the claim that
LeninÕs coup dÕŽtat gave birth
to an entirely
new state, and indeed to a new era in the history of
mankind, we must
recognize in todayÕs Soviet Union the old empire of the
Russians -- the
only empire that survived into the mid 1980ÕsÓ (Luttwak,
1).
In their Communist Manifesto of 1848,
Karl Marx and Friedrich
Engels applied
the term communism to a final stage of socialism in which
all class
differences would disappear and humankind would live in
harmony. Marx and Engels claimed to have discovered a
scientific
approach to
socialism based on the laws of history.
They declared that
the course of
history was determined by the clash of opposing forces
rooted in the
economic system and the ownership of property.
Just as
the feudal system
had given way to capitalism, so in time capitalism
would give way to
socialism. The class struggle of the
future would be
between the
bourgeoisie, who were the capitalist employers, and the
proletariat, who
were the workers. The struggle would
end, according to
Marx, in the
socialist revolution and the attainment of full communism
(GroilerÕs
Encyclopedia).
Socialism, of which ÒMarxism-LeninismÓ
is a takeoff, originated
in the West. Designed in France and Germany, it was
brought into Russia
in the middle of
the nineteenth century and promptly attracted support
among the
countryÕs educated, public-minded elite, who at that time were
called intelligentsia
(Pipes, 21). After Revolution broke out
over
Europe in 1848
the modern working class appeared on the scene as a major
historical
force. However, Russia remained out of
the changes that
Europe was
experiencing. As a socialist movement and
inclination, the
Russian
Social-Democratic Party continued the traditions of all the
Russian
Revolutions of the past, with the goal of conquering political
freedom (Daniels
7).
As early as 1894, when he was
twenty-four, Lenin had become a
revolutionary
agitator and a convinced Marxist. He
exhibited his new
faith and his
polemical talents in a diatribe of that year against the
peasant-oriented
socialism of the Populists led by N.K. Mikhiaiovsky
(Wren, 3).
While Marxism had been winning
adherents among the Russian
revolutionary
intelligentsia for more than a decade previously, a
claimed Marxist
party was bit organized until 1898. In
that year a
ÒcongressÓ of
nine men met at Minsk to proclaim the establishment of the
Russian Social
Democratic WorkerÕs Party. The Manifesto
issued in the
name of the
congress after the police broke it up was drawn up by the
economist Peter
Struve, a member of the moderate Òlegal MarxistÓ group
who soon
afterward left the Marxist movement altogether.
The manifesto
is indicative of
the way Marxism was applied to Russian conditions, and
of the special
role for the proletariat (Pipes, 11).
The first true congress of the Russian
Social Democratic
WorkersÕ Party
was the Second. It convened in Brussels
in the summer of
1903, but was
forced by the interference of the Belgian authorities to
move to London,
where the proceedings were concluded.
The Second
Congress was the
occasion for bitter wrangling among the representatives
of various
Russian Marxist Factions, and ended in a deep split that was
mainly caused by
Lenin -- his personality, his drive for power in the
movement, and his
ÒhardÓ philosophy of the disciplined party
organization. At the close of the congress Lenin commanded
a temporary
majority for his
faction and seized upon the label ÒBolshevikÓ (Russian
for Majority),
while his opponents who inclined to the ÒsoftÓ or more
democratic
position became known as the ÒMensheviksÓ or minority
(Daniels, 19).
Though born only in 1879, Trotsky had
gained a leading place
among the Russian
Social-Democrats by the time of the Second party
Congress in
1903. He represented ultra-radical
sentiment that could not
reconcile itself
to LeninÕs stress on the party organization.
Trotsky
stayed with the
Menshevik faction until he joined Lenin in 1917. From
that point on, he
acomidated himself in large measure to LeninÕs
philosophy of
party dictatorship, but his reservations came to the
surface again in
the years after his fall from power (Stoessinger, 13).
In the months after the Second Congress
of the Social Democratic
Party Lenin lost
his majority and began organizing a rebellious group of
Bolsheviks. This was to be in opposition of the new
majority of the
congress, the
Menshiviks, led by Trotsky. Twenty-two
Bolsheviks,
including Lenin,
met in Geneva in August of 1904 to promote the idea of
the highly
disciplined party and to urge the reorganization of the whole
Social-Democratic
movement on Leninist lines (Stoessinger, 33).
The differences between Lenin and the
Bogdanov group of
revolutionary
romantics came to its peak in 1909.
Lenin denounced the
otzovists, also
known as the recallists, who wanted to recall the
Bolshevik
deputies in the Duma, and the ultimatists who demanded that
the deputies take
a more radical stand -- both for their philosophical
vagaries which he
rejected as idealism, and for the utopian purism of
their refusal to
take tactical advantage of the Duma. The
real issue
was LeninÕs
control of the faction and the enforcement of his brand of
Marxist
orthodoxy. Lenin demonstrated his grip
of the Bolshevik faction
at a meeting in
Paris of the editors of the BolsheviksÕ factional paper,
which had become
the headquarters of the faction.
Bogdanov and his
followers were
expelled from the Bolshevik faction, though they remained
within the
Social-Democratic fold (Wren, 95).
On March 8 of 1917 a severe food
shortage cause riots in
Petrograd. The crowds demanded food and the step down of
Tsar. When
the troops were
called in to disperse the crowds, they refused to fire
their weapons and
joined in the rioting. The army generals
reported
that it would be
pointless to send in any more troops, because they
would only join
in with the other rioters. The
frustrated tsar
responded by
stepping down from power, ending the 300-year-old Romanov
dynasty (Farah,
580).
With the tsar out of power, a new
provisional government took
over made up of
middle-class Duma representatives. Also
rising to power
was a rival
government called the Petrograd Soviet of WorkersÕ and
SoldiersÕ
Deputies consisting of workers and peasants of socialist and
revolutionary groups. Other soviets formed in towns and villages
all
across the
country. All of the soviets worked to
push a three-point
program which
called for an immediate peas, the transfer of land to
peasants, and
control of factories to workers. But the
provisional
government stood
in conflict with the other smaller governments and the
hardships of war
hit the country. The provisional
government was so
busy fighting the
war that they neglected the social problems it faced,
losing much
needed support (Farah, 580).
The Bolsheviks in Russia were confused
and divided about how to
regard the
Provisional Government, but most of them, including Stalin,
were inclined to
accept it for the time being on condition that it work
for an end to the
war. When Lenin reached Russia in April
after his
famous Òsealed
carÓ trip across Germany, he quickly denounced his
Bolshevik
colleagues for failing to take a sufficiently revolutionary
stand (Daniels,
88).
In August of 1917, while Lenin was in
hiding and the party had
been basically
outlawed by the Provisional Government, the Bolsheviks
managed to hold
their first party congress since 1907 regardless. The
most significant
part of the debate turned on the possibility for
immediate revolutionary
action in Russia and the relation of this to the
international
upheaval. The separation between the
utopian
internationalists
and the more practical Russia-oriented people was
already apparent
(Pipes, 127).
The BolsheviksÕ hope of seizing power
was hardly secret. Bold
refusal of the
provisional Government was one of their major ideals.
Three weeks
before the revolt they decided to stage a demonstrative
walkout from the
advisory assembly. When the walkout was
staged,
Trotsky denounced
the Provisional Government for its alleged
counterrevolutionary
objectives and called on the people of Russia to
support the
Bolsheviks (Daniels, 110).
On October 10 of 1917, Lenin made the
decision to take power. He
came secretly to
Petrograd to try and disperse any hesitancies the
Bolshevik
leadership had over his demand for armed revolt. Against the
opposition of two
of LeninÕs long-time lieutenants, Zinovieiv and
Kamenev, the
Central Committee accepted LeninÕs resolution which
formally
instructed the party organizations to prepare for the seizure
of power.
Finally, of October 25 the Bolshevik
revolution took place to
overthrow the
provisional government. They did so
through the agency of
the Military-Revolutionary
Committee of the Petrograd Soviet. They
forcibly
overthrew the provisional government by taking over all of the
government
buildings, such as the post office, and big corporations,
such as the power
companies, the shipyard, the telephone company.
The
endorsement of
the coup was secured from the Second All-Russian Congress
of Soviets, which
was concurrently in session. This was
known as the
ÒOctober
RevolutionÓ (Luttwak, 74) Through this,
control of Russia was
shifted to Lenin
and the Bolsheviks.
IN a quick series of decrees, the new
ÒsovietÓ government
instituted a
number of sweeping reforms, some long overdue and some
quite
revolutionary. They ranged from
ÒdemocraticÓ reforms, such as the
disestablishment of
the church and equality for the national minorities,
to the
recognition of the peasantsÕ land seizures and to openly
socialist steps
such as the nationalization of banks.
The Provisional
GovernmentÕs
commitment to the war effort was denounced.
Four decrees
were put into
action. The first four from the
Bolshevik Revolutionary
Legislation were
a decree on peace, a decree on land, a decree on the
suppression of
hostile newspapers, and a declaration of the rights of
the peoples of
Russia (Stossenger, 130).
By early 1918 the Bolshevik critics
individually made their
peace with Lenin,
and were accepted back into the party and governmental
leadership. At the same time, the Left and Soviet
administration thus
acquired the
exclusively Communist character which it has had ever
since. The Left SRÕs like the right SRÕs and the
Mensheviks, continued
to function in
the soviets as a more or less legal opposition until the
outbreak of
large-scale civil war in the middle of 1918.
At that point
the opposition
parties took positions which were either equally vocal or
openly
anti-Bolshevik, and one after another, they were suppressed.
The Eastern Front had been relatively
quiet during 1917, and
shortly after the
Bolshevik Revolution a temporary armstice was agreed
upon. Peace negotiations were then begun at the
Polish town of
Brest-Litovsk,
behind the German lines. In agreement
with their earlier
anti-imperialist
line, the Bolshevik negotiators, headed by Trotsky,
used the talks as
a discussion for revolutionary propaganda, while most
of the party
expected the eventual return of war in the name of
revolution. Lenin startled his followers in January of
1918 by
explicitly
demanding that the Soviet republic meet the German conditions
and conclude a
formal peace in order to win what he regarded as an
indispensable
Òbreathing spell,Ó instead of shallowly risking the future
of the revolution
(Daniels, 135).
Trotsky resigned as Foreign Commissar
during the Brest-Litovsk
crisis, but he
was immediately appointed Commissar of Military Affairs
and entrusted
with the creation of a new Red Army to replace the old
Russian army
which had dissolved during the revolution.
Many Communists
wanted to new military
force to be built up on strictly revolutionary
principles, with
guerrilla tactics, the election of officers, and the
abolition of
traditional discipline. Trotsky set
himself emphatically
against this
attitude and demanded an army organized in the conventional
way and employing
Òmilitary specialistsÓ -- experienced officers from
the old army.
Hostilities between the Communists and
the Whites, who were the
groups opposed to
the Bolsheviks, reached a decicive climax in 1919.
Intervention by
the allied powers on the side of the Whites almost
brought them
victory. Facing the most serious White
threat led by
General Denikin
in Southern Russia, Lenin appealed to his followers for
a supreme effort,
and threatened ruthless repression of any opposition
behind the
lines. By early 1920 the principal White
forces were
defeated (Wren,
151). For three years the rivalry went
on with the
Whites capturing
areas and killing anyone suspected of Communist
practices. Even though the Whites had more soldiers in
their army, they
were not nearly
as organized nor as efficient as the Reds, and therefore
were unable to
rise up (Farah, 582).
Police action by the Bolsheviks to
combat political opposition
commenced with
the creation of the ÒCheka.Ó Under the
direction of
Felix
Dzerzhinsky, the Cheka became the prototype of totalitarian secret
police systems,
enjoying at critical times the right the right of
unlimited arrest
and summary execution of suspects and hostages.
The
principle of such
police surveillance over the political leanings of the
Soviet population
has remained in effect ever since, despite the varying
intensity of
repression and the organizational changes of the police --
from Cheka to GPU
(The State Political Administration) to NKVD (PeopleÕs
Commissariat of
Internal Affairs) to MVD (Ministry of Internal Affairs)
to the now
well-known KGB (Committee for State Security) (Pipes, 140).
Lenin
used his secret police in his plans to use terror to
achieve his goals
and as a political weapon against his enemies.
Anyone
opposed to the
communist state was arrested. Many
socialists who had
backed LeninÕs
revolution at first now had second thoughts.
To escape
punishment, they
fled. By 1921 Lenin had strengthened his
control and
the White armies
and their allies had been defeated (Farah, 582).
Communism had now been established and
Russia had become a
socialist
country. Russia was also given a new name: The Union of Soviet
Socialist
Republics. This in theory meant that the
means of production
was in the hands
of the state. The state, in turn, would
build the
future, classless
society. But still, the power was in the
hands of the
party (Farah,
583). The next decade was ruled by a
collective
dictatorship of
the top party leaders. At the top level
individuals
still spoke for
themselves, and considerable freedom for factional
controversy
remained despite the principles of unity laid down in 1921.
Works Cited
Daniels, Robert
V., A Documentary History of Communism. New York:
Random House Publishing, 1960.
Farah, Mounir,
The Human Experience. Columbus: Bell & Howess Co.,
1990.
Luttwak, Edward
N., The Grand Strategy of the Soviet Union. New
York: St. MartinÕs Press, 1983.
Pipes, Richard,
Survival is Not Enough. New York: S&S Publishing,
1975.
Stoessinger, John
G., Nations in Darkness. Boston: Howard Books,
1985.
Wren, Christopher
S., The End of the Line. San Francisco:
Blackhawk Publishing, 1988.
No comments:
Post a Comment